Debate Topics10 min readJune 8, 2026

Debate Motions: 90 Ready-to-Run Motions and How to Read One Correctly

90 ready-to-run debate motions plus how to read a "This House" motion correctly: motion types, burden-setting, and balanced motions sorted by difficulty.

debate motionsthis house wouldthis house believesparliamentary debate motionsworld schools motionsmotion debate

A debate motion is the exact sentence a round is fought over — the proposition the proposition side must defend and the opposition must defeat. It is not a topic. "Social media" is a topic; "This House would ban under-16s from social media" is a motion. The difference matters more than almost anything else in competitive debate, because a motion assigns burdens, fixes the scope, and quietly decides what counts as winning before the first speaker stands up.

This guide does two things. First, it teaches you how to read a motion correctly — the skill that wins more rounds than any clever argument, because most lost rounds are lost by misreading what the motion actually required. Second, it gives you 90 balanced, tested motions sorted by difficulty and type, ready to run in practice or competition.

What a Debate Motion Actually Is

In British Parliamentary, World Schools, and most parliamentary formats, motions are written as a single sentence beginning with "This House." That phrase is a convention inherited from the Westminster parliament, where members address "the House." It does not mean a literal building — "This House" stands in for the body making the decision: a government, a society, an institution, or sometimes an individual acting reasonably. Reading "This House" as "we, the people deciding this question" is the correct frame.

The verb after "This House" sets the motion type, and that is where most of the interpretive work lives.

The Four Motion Types — And Why the Verb Decides Your Burden

This House Would (THW) — policy motions. These propose an action. "This House would legalize all drugs." The proposition's burden is to show the action is, on balance, better than the status quo or the most reasonable alternative. THW motions are the most common and the most beginner-friendly, because the clash is concrete: do this, or do not.

This House Believes That (THBT) — value or analysis motions. These assert a claim about how the world is or should be valued. "This House believes that the internet has done more harm than good." There is no policy to enact; the burden is to defend the truth of the belief. THBT motions reward analysis over mechanism. You are not building a plan; you are proving a proposition.

This House Supports / Regrets / Prefers — stance motions. "This House regrets the rise of cancel culture." "This House, as the environmental movement, would prioritize nuclear power over renewables." These ask you to adopt a stance or a comparison. "Regrets" motions are retrospective — you argue a past development was, net, bad — and they do not require you to propose undoing it, only to evaluate it.

This House, as X, would... — actor motions. These put you in the shoes of a specific actor: "This House, as the United States, would withdraw from NATO." Your arguments must come from that actor's interests and constraints, not from a neutral god's-eye view. Misreading the actor is the fastest way to lose an actor motion.

The single most common rookie error is debating a THBT motion as though it were a THW motion — building an elaborate policy mechanism when the motion only asked you to defend a belief. Read the verb first. It tells you what you have to prove. For the deeper skill of controlling what the round is about, see framing in debate.

How to Read a Motion in 90 Seconds

When you receive a motion, run this checklist before you brainstorm a single argument:

  • Identify the verb and the motion type. Would, believes, regrets, supports, prefers? This sets your burden.
  • Find the actor. Is it a neutral "This House," or a specific actor ("as the EU," "as a parent")? The actor constrains which arguments are available.
  • Define the contested terms. "Ban," "young people," "the West," "more harm than good" — these need reasonable definitions, and defining them well is half the round. The opposition can challenge an unreasonable definition, so aim for the interpretation a fair-minded person would accept, not the one that makes your life easiest.
  • State the comparison. Almost every motion is implicitly "compared to what?" THW legalize drugs compared to the current prohibition. THBT social media is net harmful compared to a world without it. Naming the comparative is how you stop the round from becoming two ships passing in the night.
  • Locate the clash. Where will the two sides actually disagree? That is where you spend your time.
  • Doing this consistently is the difference between a debater who answers the motion and one who answers a motion they wish they had been given. The reading skill generalizes; the related case-building method is in how to write a debate case.

    What Makes a Motion Balanced

    A good motion is balanced: a competent team can win either side. An unbalanced motion ("This House believes genocide is wrong") produces a non-debate, because one side has no defensible ground. When you write your own motions for practice, test balance by genuinely trying to build the opposition case. If you cannot find three real arguments against, the motion is broken.

    Balance is not the same as difficulty. "This House would abolish prisons" is balanced and hard. "This House would have school start an hour later" is balanced and easy. Both are usable; they just train different things. The 90 motions below are sorted so you can pick by the level you need. For the principles behind what separates a workable topic from a dud, see good debate topics.

    30 Beginner Motions (Concrete, Accessible Clash)

    These have clear stakes and require no specialist knowledge. Ideal for novices and classroom rounds.

  • This House would make voting compulsory
  • This House would ban homework in primary schools
  • This House believes that social media has done more harm than good
  • This House would lower the voting age to 16
  • This House would ban single-use plastics
  • This House would make public transport free
  • This House believes that zoos do more good than harm
  • This House would ban advertising aimed at children
  • This House would replace exams with continuous assessment
  • This House would make school uniforms mandatory
  • This House believes that influencers are bad role models
  • This House would ban professional athletes from competing while injured
  • This House would require all restaurants to display calorie counts
  • This House would make recycling legally mandatory for households
  • This House believes that homework does more harm than good
  • This House would ban junk food advertising before 9pm
  • This House would give every student a free laptop
  • This House would abolish tipping in restaurants
  • This House believes that video games are a net positive for young people
  • This House would make financial literacy a required school subject
  • This House would ban smoking in all public places
  • This House would replace grades with pass/fail
  • This House believes that reality TV is harmful
  • This House would make voting available online
  • This House would ban keeping exotic animals as pets
  • This House would require companies to offer a four-day work week
  • This House believes that homework should be optional
  • This House would ban cars from city centers
  • This House would make museum entry free everywhere
  • This House would lower the legal driving age
  • 30 Intermediate Motions (Requires a Framework)

    These reward debaters who can build a value framework and weigh competing principles. Good for school teams with a season under their belt.

  • This House would legalize all recreational drugs
  • This House believes that liberal democracies should ban political donations from corporations
  • This House would abolish the monarchy
  • This House believes that the right to privacy outweighs national security
  • This House would impose term limits on all elected officials
  • This House believes that developed nations owe reparations for colonialism
  • This House would ban private schools
  • This House believes that we should prioritize economic growth over environmental protection
  • This House would make sentences for white-collar crime as severe as for violent crime
  • This House believes that whistleblowers should be granted full legal immunity
  • This House would replace prisons with rehabilitation-focused facilities
  • This House believes that the state should not fund the arts
  • This House would allow citizens to vote directly on national budgets
  • This House believes that mandatory national service does more good than harm
  • This House would tax wealth, not just income
  • This House believes that free speech should include the right to offend
  • This House would ban gambling advertising entirely
  • This House believes that the welfare state creates dependency
  • This House would make union membership automatic for all workers
  • This House believes that protest that breaks the law is sometimes justified
  • This House would abolish the Senate (or upper house)
  • This House believes that meritocracy is a myth that justifies inequality
  • This House would require corporations to put workers on their boards
  • This House believes that we should open all borders
  • This House would ban the use of facial recognition by police
  • This House believes that civil disobedience is a duty, not just a right
  • This House would nationalize essential utilities
  • This House believes that the news media does more harm than good to democracy
  • This House would grant legal personhood to major rivers and ecosystems
  • This House believes that compulsory voting strengthens democracy
  • 30 Advanced Motions (Specialist Knowledge and Nuance)

    These reward debaters with strong background knowledge and the ability to handle genuine moral or strategic complexity. Suited to competitive circuit teams.

  • This House would prohibit the development of artificial general intelligence
  • This House, as the environmental movement, would prioritize nuclear power over renewables
  • This House believes that the International Criminal Court does more harm than good
  • This House would abolish intellectual property protections for pharmaceuticals
  • This House, as a developing nation, would reject conditional aid from Western institutions
  • This House believes that liberal states should use targeted sanctions over military intervention
  • This House regrets the framing of mental health in the language of medical diagnosis
  • This House would grant AI systems limited legal rights once they pass agreed thresholds
  • This House believes that the social model of disability should replace the medical model in policy
  • This House, as the feminist movement, would abandon the goal of gender-neutral parenting
  • This House would allow markets in human organs
  • This House believes that effective altruism is a flawed framework for doing good
  • This House regrets the rise of identity as the primary axis of political organization
  • This House would condition trade agreements on labor and environmental standards
  • This House believes that democracies should never negotiate with authoritarian regimes on human rights
  • This House, as the global left, would abandon degrowth as a strategy
  • This House would ban predictive policing algorithms
  • This House believes that humanitarian intervention without UN authorization is sometimes justified
  • This House regrets the professionalization of activism
  • This House would require sovereign wealth funds to divest from fossil fuels
  • This House believes that restorative justice should replace retributive justice for most crimes
  • This House would abolish the veto power of permanent UN Security Council members
  • This House, as a major social media platform, would abolish the recommendation algorithm
  • This House believes that the concept of the nation-state has outlived its usefulness
  • This House would allow developing nations to industrialize using fossil fuels without penalty
  • This House regrets the dominance of GDP as the measure of national success
  • This House believes that liberalism cannot survive without a shared cultural foundation
  • This House would impose a global minimum corporate tax with no exemptions
  • This House believes that we have a moral obligation to colonize space
  • This House, as the labor movement, would embrace automation rather than resist it
  • How to Practice With These Motions

    A motion list is only useful if you run rounds with it. Pull a motion at random, give yourself 15 minutes of prep (the standard in many formats), and build a case for the side you find harder — that is where the learning is. If you have a partner, swap sides after each round so neither of you only ever argues the position you already agree with. The full preparation routine is in how to prepare for a debate.

    If you do not have a sparring partner, you can still run unlimited rounds against an AI opponent that takes whichever side you do not, which is the fastest way to test whether your reading of the motion holds up under pressure — try any motion above on the ladder. The format-specific rules that govern how these motions are run are in parliamentary debate and World Schools debate format.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    What is the difference between a debate motion and a debate topic? A topic is a subject area ("immigration"). A motion is a single, precise, debatable sentence drawn from that subject ("This House would open all borders"). You debate motions, not topics. Browsing debate topics helps you find subject areas; converting one into a sharp motion is the next step.

    What does "This House" mean in a debate motion? It is a parliamentary convention meaning the body deciding the question — a government, society, or reasonable decision-maker — not a literal house. Read it as "we who are deciding this."

    How do I know which side of a motion I am on? In formal competition, sides are assigned, usually by coin toss or draw, and you must be able to argue either. The proposition (or government) defends the motion; the opposition defeats it. Being able to argue the side you disagree with is the core skill — see how to be a good debater.

    Are "This House would" and "This House believes that" interchangeable? No, and treating them as interchangeable is a classic error. "Would" demands you defend an action and its consequences; "believes that" demands you defend the truth of a claim. The verb sets your burden of proof — covered in burden of proof in debate.

    How long should a debater spend interpreting a motion before arguing? About a quarter of your prep time. Misreading the motion wastes the other three quarters. Run the five-step reading checklist above first, every time.

    Ready to put these skills to the test? Practice debating against AI on Debate Ladder.

    Ready to sharpen your debate skills?

    Practice against AI opponents and earn your ELO ranking.

    Start Debating Free